For me, is very important if someone helps me to correct my errors.Thank you so much!
The best way to solve the worldʼs environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people say that several ecological problems that affect world has been caused by technology because in the past many of these troubles did not exist. However, others believe that the best way to solve it is increment the price of combustible. I shall my point of view analyzing the both point of view.
One side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that those who go to work by car will think twice before getting it because fuel will be pretty expensive in comparison with price of public transportation. Moreover, will contribute with the environment; one good illustration of this is whether one person everyday take a bus or train will notice that end of month has saved much money. It is possible to say that governments could raise more money which may invest in public health, build schools, etc.
On the other hand, it is possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact increasing the price of fuel is not the unique solution. There are others alternatives ideas such as using electrical vehicles. In developed countries are already sending this kind of modes of transport, however are still too expensive. A particularly good example is that in Japan the level of pollution has reduced to minimum levels.
As we have seen, there are no easy answers to this question. On balance, however I tend to believe that human being is so smart to solve their environmental problems with wisdom.
TOEFL listening lectures: Which aspect of bee behavior does the professor mainly discuss?