According to THE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR (1994), the experts do not always agree on terminology.
Some experts use the term “complex transitive verb” to describe a "verb that takes an obligatory [my emphasis] adverbial:
She put the car in the garage. [My note: Native speakers do not accept “She put the car.”]
He threw himself into the role. [My note: Native speakers do not accept "He threw himself.]
I am pretty sure that native speakers will not accept “He put the book.” You MUST have an adverbial, too: on the table.
According to that book, a ditransitive (or “double transitive”) verb has a direct object and an indirect object:
I gave my mother flowers.
I gave flowers to my mother.
As you can see, your sentence does not contain two objects.
James
The authors of that book deserve credit: Ms. Sylvia Chalker and Mr. Edmund Weiner.
That book ALSO uses that term to describe this kind of sentence:
Let’s paint the town RED.
They made him LEADER.
“town” is the direct object; “red” is the OBJECT COMPLEMENT.
Those authors say this:
"One analyst’s “ditransitives” … are another’s “complex transitives.” (So I guess it all depends on which definition your teacher has decided to accept.)
That book ALSO uses that term to describe this kind of sentence:
Let’s paint the town RED.
They made him LEADER.
“town” is the direct object; “red” is the OBJECT COMPLEMENT.
Those authors say this:
"One analyst’s “ditransitives” … are another’s “complex transitives.” (So I guess it all depends on which definition your teacher has decided to accept.)
That book ALSO uses that term to describe this kind of sentence:
Let’s paint the town RED.
They made him LEADER.
“town” is the direct object; “red” is the OBJECT COMPLEMENT.
Those authors say this:
"One analyst’s “ditransitives” … are another’s “complex transitives.” (So I guess it all depends on which definition your teacher has decided to accept.)