Hi,
I read the following sentence , and I can’t understand what sentence structure of “atoned” here.
[color=blue]“Would Mr Darcy then consider the rashness of your original intention as atoned for by your obstinacy in adhering to it?” We know “consider sb/sth as sth” , here “as " shouldn’t be a prep, because “atoned” is v-ed, acting as an adj seemingly. So , if it were , it could be said like,”[color=blue] Would Mr Darcy then consider the rashness of your original intention atoned for by your obstinacy in adhering to it?" Or I wonder if there could be added with some words or not, for instance, " Would Mr Darcy the consider …as [color=blue]what is atoned for …" ? The other question is, I wonder if the word “by” is unecessary or not? Is it right to say" [color=blue]Would Mr Darcy then consider the rashness of your original intention atoned for your obstinacy in adhering to it?"
I am not meaning to challenge Jane Austen. Just don’t know this sentence much! :oops:
Thanks, welcome to give your opinions!
F.F