The reading passage and the lecturer discuss Stonehenge. More specifically, the passage presents 3 arguments evidencing that the site was constructed for funeral matters, meanwhile, the professor believes otherwise.
To begin, the author claims that Stonehenge was a burial site since researchers found fragments of bones during excavations. However, the professor disagrees completely, therefore people had known the existence of the fragments for hundred of years ago. Actually, the discovery of the fragments does not indicate that the site was constructed to be used as a burial site.
Additionally, the reading passage states the presence of blue stones. It suggested that they are associated with burial rituals, which helps defend the burial site’s hypothesis. Nevertheless, the lecturer points out that the real purpose of the bluestones is not unclear. In fact, some scholars believe that bluestones were used as a magic weapon for healing. Thus, the site could be constructed not as a burial site, but as a healing site, and the fragments found were from the people that could not be cured.
Finally, the passage suggests that the discovery of a mace represents a burial ritual of a high-ranking person, possibly for a political leader, thereby the excavators also found incense and other objects used on a funeral ritual. On the contrary, the professor believes that the mace is not a piece of accurate evidence to believe that Stonehenge was used as a funeral site. In fact, the excavators found a mace and other sorts of objects that do not indicate that this specific place was constructed with the purpose of a burial site.
In conclusion, the author presented diverse evidence to support his or her hypothesis, but the professor challenges each of his or her arguments.
Hi, please find an amended version of your essay below:
The reading passage and the lecturer discuss Stonehenge. More specifically, the passage presents 3 arguments that prove the site was built for burial purposes, while the professor believes the opposite.
First, the author claims that Stonehenge was a burial site, as researchers have found fragments of bones during excavations. However, the professor has a completely different opinion, according to which people would have known about the existence of the fragments hundreds of years ago. In fact, the discovery of the fragments does not indicate that the site was built as a burial ground.
Additionally, the reading passage mentions the presence of bluestones. It suggests that they are associated with burial rituals, which helps defend the burial site hypothesis. Nevertheless, the lector points out that the true purpose of the bluestones is not unclear. In fact, some scholars believe that the bluestones were used as a magical weapon for healing. Thus, the site may have been built not as a burial site but as a healing site, and the fragments found came from the people who could not be healed.
Finally, the passage suggests that the finding of a mace represents a burial ritual of a high-ranking person, possibly for a political leader, which also allowed the excavators to find incense and other objects used in a burial ritual. On the contrary, the professor believes that the mace is not accurate evidence that Stonehenge was used as a burial site. In fact, the excavators found a mace and other types of objects that do not indicate that this particular site was built with the purpose of a burial site.
In conclusion, the author presented various evidence to support his hypothesis, but the professor challenges each of his arguments.