Hi, how are you? I would like to know when “proud” must be followed by “of”, and when by “to”. I think that “to” is used when preceding a verb, isn´t it?
Here are my examples.
1.- I am proud OF him
2.- I am proud TO have talked to him.
Or should it be “proud of having…”?
Thanks, Micawber! But I still don´t understand why the first sentence can be said with “to” and “of”…
I am proud of/to having/have talked to him
Is there any difference in terms of meaning?
I see “have talked” as a verb, not as a noun phrase. In fact, I don´t really understand the term “noun phrase”. Could you be more specific, please? Thanks in advance!
.
Pedro, you seem to have misread my posting, or at least confused what I stated. All I can do at the moment is repeat my simple statements:
Use proud to when a verb follows: I am proud to have talked to him; I am proud to be here.
Use proud of when a noun phrase follows: I am proud of having talked to him; I am proud of my father.
There is no difference in intent between these two:
I am proud to have talked to him
I am proud of having talked to him
A noun phrase is noun phrase is a phrase that has a noun as its head; it generally includes one or more modifying words, but there are single-word minimal noun phrases that are composed only of a noun or pronoun. Thse are noun phrases (in brackets, with the head noun underlined):
[A big fat bear] sat on [the porkpie hat that I bought last June].
[Running over 42 kilometers] is [no fun].
[The oysters] are [mine].
.
. I am proud of having talked to him. Which word would it work as “head noun”? Would it be “having”? – Yes
“I am proud to be here” (“Be here” is not a noun phrase– Right)
But, could I say “I am proud of being here” or “I am proud of being here with you”? – Yes. Being here (with you) is the noun phrase, and being is its head.
.