In the past, the search for the other worlds was different because of two factors.
First, planets are tiny objects comparing/compared with stars:the sun,a typical star, is 300,000 times more massive than the Earth. Second, planets do not shine but only reflect light dimly from stars.
Which one in bold is correct? And why? Would you please explain to me?
For me, comparing is the correct one. All I can tell is the present participle carrying the active meaning, while the past participle tends to be passive meaning.
The original clause should be “First, planets are tiny objects which compare with stars…”
As Professor Michael Swan said on Practical English usage :
Sometime the past participle can be used as active meaning but some rare exceptional cases . That also got me headache.
Ex : A fallen leaf (a leaf that has fallen) . advanced students (students who have advanced to a high level.
An escaped prisoner, developed country.
past participle can be used as active meaning (only with adverb) :
A much-travelled man, a well-read person (NOT a read person).
active past participle can be used after be : those curtains are badly faded, We are all grown up now.
The words : recovered, stopped, finished are used after be, not usually before noun
Why are all those cars stopped at the crossroads ? (Not stopped car)
I’ll be finished in a few minutes
Those days are gone now.
I hope you are fully recovered from your operation.
You need ‘compared’ because it means: when they are compared. The point is that the planets are not doing the comparing themselves but are being compared.
I’m not sure that this is an exceptional case? It seems to follow your primary rule of “the present participle carrying the active meaning, while the past participle tends to be passive meaning”.
Even in its earliest days, the United States was a very large country, streching/streched over 1600 kilometers of coastline.
I have always been confused about the present and past participle.
My teacher said that "streching" is correct here but he could not explain why...?
As Waiyin Cheng and Dozy said "the present participle carrying the active meaning, while the past participle tends to be passive meaning".
But, I think, the passive meaning is expressed here. Is this an exceptional case?
The reason for ‘stretching’ is that it describes the physical size of the country. It would be the same as saying something like: The village is in a rural situation lying in a deep valley. In your example ‘stretched’ would suggest that someone/something had physically stretched the country, which is clearly absurd.
I got to know to change the sentence with "-ing clause" to the sentence with the relative clause. For example:
The road [b]connecting [/b]the two villages is very narrow
The road [b]which (or that) connects [/b]two villages is very narrow
I am sure it is grammatically correct!
But how to change the following sentence to the sentence with the relative clauce?
Even in its earliest days, the United States was a very large country, streching over 1600 kilometers of coastline.
“Participles” is really one of the complicated grammar points in English.
If I put the main clause at the beginning of the sentence,then the following would be right?:
The villa had a wonderful view, situating in the countryside.
I suspect that this should be
The invention of the printing press was one of the most important events in the history of the world.
If ‘prose’ truly is correct, then it would need to be ‘printed prose’ (no article), but ‘invention’ and ‘events’ then seems to be a strange choice.
Possibly:
The ability to produce printed prose was one of the most important acquisitions in the history of the world.
‘Prose’ is defined as generally written or spoken language. As is suggested above, you have probably confused ‘prose’ with ‘press’. In line with other questions you have asked you need ‘printing press’ because the machine (the printing press) is doing the printing. Contrast that with ‘the printed/the spoken word’, both telling you what has been done to the word.