Hi,
Kindly correct the sentence whether it is in a proper way or not. This is just calling 2nd party for the meeting.
"As discussed, we would like to have a presentation on …and subsequently detailed discussion on … in order to complete as soon as possible/finalize. the meeting will be scheduled on …date in line with our discussion.
We will confirm that Mr John is also joining with us for the meeting"
Please correct me the mistakes that I have made in the above conversation.
Reagards
Chary
"As discussed, we would like to have a presentation on …and a subsequent detailed discussion in order to finalise the … as soon as possible. The meeting is scheduled for…, as discussed.
We confirm that Mr John is also joining us for the meeting"
This assumes that there is a presentation on one date and a meeting on another date.
Thanks a lot, but presentation and meeting will be conducted in the same day. which means presentation followed by discussion on the same topic.
could please tell me difference of ‘subsequently’ and ‘subsequent’.
That works too - presentation at one time, then meeting at another time.
Your original made it sound as if there were to be a presentation followed by two meetings.
Thanks for your reply,
could you pl tell me when I can following words and pl quote your examples as well as explanation.
‘will, will be, would, would be, could, could be, shall, shall be, should, should be, has, had, have, can’
I will appreciate for your many examples and explanation on the same.
please correct this sentence ‘I believe he has clarified most of your questions’ or I believe most of your questions [color=blue]had clarified’ can I use the word ‘was or has or have been, or had been’ instead of ‘had’
please explain me
First of all, please don’t write using abbreviations such as ‘pl’. It is not good practice and does not help the reader.
Your question about the various forms of verbs is too wide ranging to answer in a forum message. There are many grammar wweb pages devoted to these.
I believe he has clarified most of your questions. (Though this actually means ‘he has made clear what you wish to ask’, not ‘he has made the answers clear’.)
I believe most of your questions have been clarified. (Also meaning that what you wish to ask has been made clear.)
‘Please explain me’ is not correct. You need to say ‘Please explain to me’ as otherwise the phrase indicates that you wish me to explain about you to someone else.
Thank you very much.
could you please correct the grammar in below
" this is with reference to telephonic conversation had with you yesterday"
" This is in reference to our yesterdays discussions"
“As per our yesterdays discussions”
" As discussed with you yesterday"
“This is with reference our telephone conversation had with you in couple of weeks back/in last week/in couple of days back”
Could you please correct the grammar in above sentence and along with your explanation.
Regards
chary
This is with/in reference to the telephone conversation I had with you yesterday.
This is in reference to yesterday’s discussion(s).
or
This is in reference to our discussion(s) yesterday.
As per yesterday’s discussions
or
As per our discussions yesterday.
As discussed with you yesterday.
This is with/in reference to the telephone conversation we had a couple of weeks back/ago.
This is with/in reference to the telephone conversation we had last week.
This is with/in reference to the telephone conversation we had a couple of days ago.
Thanks,
clarification in #8.
I wouldn’t use it at all in general conversation, and certainly not when you mean you have been speaking on the telephone. ‘Telephony’ encompasses the general use of equipment to provide voice communication over distances, specifically by connecting telephones to each other. Telephone conversations are not descriped as ‘telephonic’.
You could use either, as indicated in the other sentences. My preference as a native English speaker would be ‘in’ each time.
is completely incorrect and you should not use it at all.