The map gives information about two places which could be available to locate the supermarket of Garlsdon.
Overall, we can see that one possible position is out of town while the other one is in the town centre. There are three main roads and one railway for transport through the town of Garlsdon, which has 65000 inhabitants.
Looking at the out-of-town supermarket, it is located in the northwest countryside of Garlsdon, between the railway and the main road from the centre to Hindon, which is far from the town 12 km. This site is also nearby residental area and the north industry area of the town.
Turning to the central supermarket, it is situated on the site that has no access to transportation. This place is surrounded by housing area and in the vicinity of the south industry area. There are three main roads from the site of this supermarket to three other smaller towns, which are Hindon, Bransdon and Cransdon. The only railway of the Garlsdon town also runs through the site of this supermarket.
Hi Haru, I think you have done pretty good job with this report. I think only “site” or “location” work here, “position” sounds odd in this context. But as I have done, you can also use “plan” or “proposal” Your report also seemed confusing when talking about site 2. I think if you had said it is located near the center of town in an area closed to traffic, it would have been more clear. Also, the site currently exists, so you can say “the site is located”, but the supermarket is not yet built, so I think when talking about the supermarket, you should say “the supermarket would be located”. Here are some other suggestions:
Hi Luschen, thank you so much for your advice.
In the area of the second supermarket, the question said that “Town centre (no traffic zone)”, so what I mean is that you can’t travel within this area by private vehicles but it still has roads to access to this area, and then you can go on foot or sth likes that
