Resolving problems between individuals or groups is important. What should be considered or kept in mind in resolving problems between individuals or groups? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Well, it is always difficult to say what should be considered in problem situations, duo to fact that both groups or parties persuite a goal. It totally depends on the diplomacy of the negotiator and of course several other facts who participate their. Nevertheless it is also a huge fact what the issue is and what plays a roll in it. One always has to consider the value and importance of the special situation.
Firstly to state therefore an example, I can give one which I have, much more every body has experienced I guess. Just imagine that you want to buy a new car and you are currently discussing the price with the salesman. Both participants have to be satisfied with the bargain therefore, each of both need to go a step in the other, opposite direction. Only if that happens and the supposed customer as well as the company acquires a common point,the deal is done.
Secondly I am sure that one should keep in mind while resolving the problem, what may the future brings. Nobody can predict that, so it would maybe be wise to act properly. Even a couple years later, after the problem, or whatever it was, it could be a situation appear where you need once again something from this special negotiation partner. If you solve the problem smart, you can still count on the other person further, moreover, you do not decries your opportunities.
Finally to me should be the way how one tread the other person be considered, it is important that both parties are satisfied and of course while resolving a problem keep in mind what may the future brings. All this facts added up together makes to me a good problem- solving – strategy.
TOEFL listening discussions: What is the main weakness of the student’s essay?
Resolving problems between individuals or groups is important. What should be considered or kept in mind in resolving problems between individuals or groups? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Well, it is always difficult to say what should be considered in problemATICAL situations, duE to THE fact that both groups or parties persuE THE SAME goal. It totally depends on the diplomacy of the negotiator, and of course several other facts. who participate their. Nevertheless it is also a huge fact what the issue is and what plays a roll in it. One always has to consider the value and importance of the special situation.
Firstly to state therefore an example, I can give one which I have. much more Everybody has experienced THIS I guess. Just imagine that you want to buy a new car and you are currently discussing the price with the salesman. Both participants have to be satisfied with the bargain therefore, each of both need to go a step in the other, opposite direction. Only if that happens and the supposed customer as well as the company acquires a common point, the deal is done.
Secondly I am sure that one should keep in mind while resolving the problem, what may the future bring? Nobody can predict that, so it would maybe be wise to act properly. Even a couple OF years later, after the problem, or whatever it was, it could be a situation COULD appear where you need once again something from this special negotiation partner. If you solve the problem smartLY, you can still count on the other person further, moreover, you do not decrY your opportunities.
Finally, to me should be REMEMBER the way one treaTS the other person SHOULD be considered. It is important that both parties are satisfied and of course while resolving a problem keep in mind what may the future bring. All thESE facts added up together makes to me a good problem- solving – strategy.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Good work Chris. You are definitely improving.
Kitos. 8/10
Thank you kitos 
I work on it !!
I work on it !!