According to vs with respect to vs referring to vs duo to vs regarding

Hello everyone,

I’d like to know if there is any difference between ‘according to’, ‘with respect to’, ‘referring to’, ‘duo to’ and ‘regarding’ when they are used to express the meaning of ‘as stated by’. :slight_smile:

For instance:

According to the old legend, Romulus was the founder of Rome.

Could I replace ‘according to’ by ‘referring to’,‘regarding’, etc. Will the sentence remain the same meaning as it was before? :slight_smile: Many thanks.

" According to the old legend" is the only one that really fits the sentence in that construction.

Xiao Shi,
A small correction – du[color=red]e to.

Hello all,

I know these are not replacements for ‘according to’ but are these correct –

  1. If the old legend is to be believed, Romulus was the founder of Rome.

  2. If we go by the the old legend, Romulus was the founder of Rome.

Thank you, Bill and Gray.

Good morning Gray, I hope all is well with you.

  1. If the (old) legend is to be believed, Romulus was the founder of Rome.

  2. Is an acceptable construction.( Don’t think old is required. Legends are old.)

  3. If we go by the the old legend, Romulus was the founder of Rome.

  4. Makes sense, but if I may suggest … " If we are to believe the legend, Romulus was the founder of Rome ".

Good morning Bill. I am fine, thanks. Do enjoy the shining sun on Sunday morning!

This is what I see through the window –