Let’s wait until what you refer to as
raise the issue themselves. I am puzzled why you spend your time devoting your efforts to making mountains out of molehills.
Alan
.
Could be the same reason you do. 
.
.
You seem to be puzzled fairly often, Alan.
It’s a shame, though, to stick your head in the sand and simply pretend there is nothing that needs editing in the tests. I mean, there have recently been lots of typos corrected, but there have also been some whoppers. A majority of the errors already edited had been stagnating on the site for years. Why is that? Perhaps because no one wanted to have to deal with what I’m dealing with right now?
It’s high time somebody said something about the errors. Don’t you think they’ve stagnated long enough?
It’s puzzling that you feel it is appropriate and professional to withhold any and all explanation on the question I’ve raised about sentence 6/7. You wrote the sentence. Therefore, you are theoretically the best person to explain the tense usage.
It seems you have no explanation at all and simply don’t want to say so.
.
.
english-test.net/esl/learn/e … l-test.php
Question 2 has a typo: The word ‘as’ should be ‘a’.
Question 5 has not been edited yet.
.
.
Lost_soul has pointed out a typo in this test:
english-test.net/esl/learn/e … l-test.php
Sentence 1 should read this way:
The teenagers next door make a lot [color=blue]of racket when their parents are out of town.
.
.
Here’s another typo needing correction – compliments of a test-taker. 
english-test.net/forum/ftopi … html#64767
.
Hi Amy,
Many thanks for pointing out the typos – they’ll be corrected by tomorrow.
Regards,
Torsten[YSaerTTEW443543]
TOEIC listening, photographs: Taking the dog for a walk[YSaerTTEW443543]
.
I hope that includes all of the various types of typos.
By the way, what about some of the other older discussions of editing? For example, in this thread:
english-test.net/forum/ftopi … html#51306
Was this overlooked or forgotten? Or did the author disagree?
Here is a post that was never answered at all even though the poster made a good point:
english-test.net/forum/ftopi … html#38095
If an author disagrees with editing suggestions, don’t you think it would be worthwhile and instructive if the author also offered his/her point of view as to why the sentence does not need any editing?
.
.
Here’s another one. The typo pointed out here hasn’t been corrected:
english-test.net/forum/ftopi … html#36099
.
Hi Amy,
Thanks a lot for pointing out those mistakes – we’ll fix them soon.[YSaerTTEW443543]
TOEIC listening, photographs: Boarding the schoolbus[YSaerTTEW443543]
Hi Torsten
I’m glad this test is going to be edited:
english-test.net/forum/ftopi … html#64873
I have now added some comments in the above thread explaining why a little editing is necessary. If you think my post is unhelpful or completely unnecessary, please feel free to simply delete it.
.
Hi Amy,
What would we do without you and MM, who have taken the trouble of editing all these numerous tests. I realise how troublesome and time consuming it is both editing and parsing them. The tests are an essential ingredient of the site inasmuch as many English learners stumble onto the site through the tests like I did some time ago, when taking tests on a daily basis was my main occupation. I acknowledge that some forum members and other learners of the intermediate/ advanced levels can fix a mistake. But what about other English learners, with the poor command of the language, who are not able to define the correctness of a sentence and learn it automatically.From these considerations, the tests are worth editing thoroughly as they can easily do many test-takers a disservice.
Thanks, Pamela.
Obviously, some of the authors of the tests here have invested huge amounts of time in test-writing. It’s great that the site has so many tests to offer, but even best-selling authors and the writers of the top ESL books have editors. Typos and errors are not really unusual, and that’s what keeps so many editors and proofreaders so very busy and so very employed. :lol:
Seeing as the tests on this site are in fact “tests”, and also that this site caters to those aiming at taking standardized tests, I feel strongly that editing is a critical and necessary element for the tests here. I think it’s often much easier for someone other than the author of a test to spot a problem or typo. In addition, there are also differences in usage that a writer might not be aware of (e.g. BE vs AmE).
.
.
I wish I were, Pamela, but I am just reporting problems I stumble upon.
.
.
I think the context should be changed from wearing apparel to something else in this sentence-- it is unnecessarily confusing. Even a native speaker would hesitate before calling a hat or a dress ‘old hat’. Please see:
english-test.net/forum/ftopic19896.html
.
That, Charles is the whole point - as it means old fashioned or out of fashion, I as a native speaker did not hesitate to refer it back to an item of clothing.
Alan
.
[size=92]My last post was lost somehow, so I’m trying to repost my comments now. I hope MM will also repost his lost comments.[/size]
I think I understand your point, Alan, but I agree with Charles here. The idiomatic meaning of ‘old hat’ can be used to describe many things, but it is generally not used to describe hats or clothing. That would be a bit too literal for this idiomatic expression. The usage examples in the BNC support this.
.
.
Yes, it seems that my post was lost too-- I can’t imagine where.
I said that referring an idiom back to its source tends to regress it back to its literal meaning, and the idiom loses its power. To give a new set of examples:
The goose led the fox on a wild goose chase.
The pig in its sty is in hog heaven.
Your fedora is old hat.
Native speakers would do this only as a rather silly verbal joke, and what is an ESL/EFL student to make of them? This is not testing the idiom at all.
In the case under discussion, it left the student floundering upon a minor grammatical anomaly:
.
Hi, MM
I liked/ enjoyed your previous examples more: :lol:
Tom