Your "english" is not "standard".

in a “strict” sense, your english is not “correct” according to “traditional” usage…

please refer to the following english description on this website from this link, http://www.english-test.net/about/.

“expressions” and “materials” are “non-countable” words!!! so then, “english” should be “correct” if “expressions” and “materials” are “correct”!

then, what is the “ultimate purpose” for having a “correct standard”? yeah, why? what reasons or logic?

Hi Nudeman,

Who told you that the words ‘expressions’ and ‘materials’ or uncountable? Whoever it was they were wrong. You could have found this out yourself by referring to a dictionary.

As for the word ‘english’ it doesn’t exist. Also, if you want to continue posting your thoughts on our forum you should read this: english-test.net/community/i … ing_skills[YSaerTTEW443543]

TOEIC listening, photographs: Sitting by the pond[YSaerTTEW443543]

to torsen,
who told "U’ those words were “countable”? whoever it was, that “person” or “thing” must have been “wrong”. “U” should refer “Urself” to a “standard dictionary”, dude!
“Urr” defensiveness has already shown that “U” have low confidence in the subject…
yeah, dude, reaction tells everything…
further, the “correctness” of a language is very “subjective”… if “U” haven’t realized this point, “U” should not be a “coach” in the forum any longer… haha, let’s see “Urr” next reaction to this comment…

interesting, “Urr” location is “EU”…
by the way, take this advice: there will not be an “EU” within the next 10 years.