[color=red]a. He wouldn’t fail to notice her with her long black hair.
b. He was stunned by her with her dark, mysterious eyes.
c. With her dark, mysterious eyes, the studio hired her immediately for the role.
d. The studio hired her immediately for the role with her dark, mysterious eyes.
e. The studio hired her immediately for the role, with her dark, mysterious eyes.
?
(d) doesn’t sound right to me and in (e) the part after the comma sounds like an afterthought.
a. He wouldn’t fail to notice her with her long black hair. OK
b. He was stunned by her dark, mysterious eyes.
c. With her dark, mysterious eyes, the studio hired her immediately for the role. OK
d. The studio hired her immediately for the role with her dark, mysterious eyes. Incorrect
e. The studio hired her immediately for the role, with her dark, mysterious eyes. OK
I would choose to write that thought thus:
The studio hired her for the role immediately, thanks to/because of her dark, mysterious eyes.
[color=blue]You get the comments you deserve.
[color=blue]Are you going to write ‘an expensive, shiny new, red car’?
[color=blue]I think the above commas are intrusive and unnecessary. Perhaps using the commas or not is just a matter of style. If so, I see no merit in using the commas.
In some cases one has a choice it seems to make them cumulative or coordinate. In the case of ‘an expensive shiny new red car’ one does not have that choice.
‘Dark and mysterious’ exists as well. If one can put ‘and’ between the adjectives, then one can put a comma between them as well.
Many thanks.
PS. Both versions are correct. But I don’t see why Beeesneees would deserve abusive comments even if her version was incorrect. Let us assume, for argument’s sake, that she has made a mistake (which is not the case). Well, if everybody who made mistakes deserved abusive comments, then the world would be full of abusive comments.