Hi teachers,
Context:
Mary: Peter! What are you thinking? We don’t have any drinks yet. Are you going to get us some drinks or we’re going to be here the whole day without them?
Peter: All right! I’ll get them.
Peter starts for the counter.
What did Peter do after Mary’s complaint?
He started for the counter to get the drinks.
Personally I, would say, “What was Peter’s reaction to Mary’s complaint/How did he react to…?”
If you insist on ‘what he did after’, I would say, ‘after hearing Mary’s…’
I meant you made an amendment relying on some grammar rule.
My take on it: it’s a case of interrogative sentence being declarative in fact, and thus used to display emotions (irritation/sarcasm/impatience) which I believe suits the situation. What she does, she doesn’t put two questions allowing him to choose between the two alternatives—she prompts him to act really.
It’s not correct as written. If the last part is not to be a question then the question mark should be moved up, and the sentence repunctuated. For example:
Mary: Peter! What are you thinking? We don’t have any drinks yet. Are you going to get us some drinks? We’re going to be here the whole day without any!
It could be either, depending on whether it is perceived as an exclamation or more of a flat statement. But yes, I think you’re right, an exclamation mark often wouldn’t go amiss.