unsuitable materials on TV and Internet

In the modern world, there has been a sharp increase in the number of children who are watching television. It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable matarials on TV as well as the internet by government censorship. It also is alleged by opponents that it is the parents’ responsibility to contral what their children do or watch. Im my view, parents should talk about the drawbacks of the inappropriate materials on TV and the Internet so as to create an effect in the minds of children.

The first opinion is that preventive measures should be taken by parents. Since the protection from inappropriate materials on TV together with Internet is the parent’s responsibility. Therefore, nowadays parents have started to use parantel control programs. However, should children want to watch the films and cartoons banned by parents, they will be able to learn how to decode the programs. As a consequence, at least, parents take measures for children to affect such a least level that from unsuitable materials on TV as well as Internet.

On the other hand, opponents of view claim that it can easily be said that children must be protected by government censorship. Unsuitable materials on TV including Internet play a crucial role in children’ lives because they learn both useful and detrimental information by TV or Internet. Thus, at least, government should put a ban an harmful materials. For instance, even though south park includes many slang words, it has broadcasted in Turkey and in ohter countries and is watched by those under the age of 18 even although it is night-time. In brief, detrimental materials on TV and Internet need to be abolished by goverment.

In conclusion, some think that unsuitable materials on TV as well as Internet which are broadcated should be banned by goverment censorship in order to protect children. Nevertheless, opponents consider that it is the parents’ responsibility to control what their children watch. In my opinion, parents who have been suffering from unsuitable materials on TV together with Internet should take preventive measures before it is too late.

TOEFL listening discussions: Why may Martha need money?

In the modern world, there has been a sharp increase in the number of children who are watching television. It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable matErials on TV as well as the Internet by government censorship. It also is alleged by opponents that it is the parents’ responsibility to contrOl what their children do or watch. Im my view, parents should talk about the drawbacks of the inappropriate materials on TV and the Internet so as to create an effect in the minds of children.

The first opinion is that preventive measures should be taken by parents. Since the protection from inappropriate materials on TV together with THE Internet is the parent’s responsibility. Therefore, nowadays parents have started to use parEntAl control programs. However, should children want to watch the films and cartoons banned by THEIR parents, they will be able to learn how to decode the programs. As a consequence, at least, ///parents SHOULD take measures for children to affect such a least level that from unsuitable materials on TV as well as Internet./// BADLY WRITTEN.

On the other hand, opponents of THIS view claim that it can easily be said that children must be protected by government censorship. Unsuitable materials on TV, including THE Internet play a crucial role in children’ lives because they learn both useful and detrimental information by TV or THE Internet. Thus, at least, government should put a ban an harmful materials. For instance, even though South Park includes many slang words, it IS broadcast in Turkey and in MANY OTHER countries and is watched by those under the age of 18 even though it is SHOWN ONLY AT night-time. In brief, detrimental materials on TV and THE Internet need to be abolished by THE goverment.

In conclusion, some think that unsuitable materials on TV as well as THE Internet which are broadcast, should be banned by goverNment censorship in order to protect children. Nevertheless, opponents consider that it is the parents’ responsibility to control what their children watch. In my opinion, parents who CHILDREN have been AFFECTED BY unsuitable materials on TV, together with THE Internet, should take preventive measures before it is too late.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Good work Retnokisnon.

Kitos. 8/10

TOEFL listening discussions: Why may Martha need money?
[/quote]