Hello Alan,
You taught me:
The penny has dropped.
I felt that you also attacked me that’s why I wrote my first sentence.I couldn’t have written as you are not my son. It would be better: You too, Brutus? Even you, Brutus?
I read again and again your letter. It isn’t true and you really attacked me.You wrote:
1."Whenever "…"I open it up, I see you banging on about ‘embedded questions’. "
(only once you could see and not whenever; in the 22# I mentioned embedded, because in the 21# even I didn’t know this expression) - after I wanted to finish this thread but I received letters and I had to answer.
2." Now I have seen the good lady(?) talking highfalutin/pretentious stuff about the same topic.(in Hungarian it is very fort flak)"
3." Kati, what is it that’s bugging you? Please tell me." -Many thanks for this last sentence because it’s very human and you gave me possibility to say that I wanted to bottom a grammatical problem.
I received Ozzy’s letter. It is good if you have a Sancho Pancha. He wtote me earlier:“Please ignore me if I have misunderstood the question. I haven’t been following this thread!”
NOW he wrote .
“If it isn’t ‘learn’, please explain what it means with ‘lean’.”
This is almost same what I wrote in 21#
“Please explain me what this sentence means with learn and what it means with lean?”
But you say the sentence is good with an inversion, then it was: A storm in a teacup.
But for me was very useful garmmatically.
Best regards:
Kati Svaby