Jupiter
September 2, 2006, 1:56am
1
Hi teachers,
Please look at the following
“The man who is being interviewed was suspected of arsen.” can be reduced to " The man being interviewed was suspected of arsen."
Can I say " The being interviewed man was suspected of arsen."? Does it make sense?
Thanks in advance
Jupiter
Bara
September 2, 2006, 3:39am
2
Hi
In my own opinion, it could be reduced to “The man being interviewed was suspected of arsen”. The other sentence “The being interviewed man was suspected of arsen” seems not correct to me.
Baraa
Yankee
September 2, 2006, 6:20am
3
.
No, “the being interviewed man ” is not a good alternative, Jupiter.
.
Tamara
September 2, 2006, 6:28am
4
Hi
Can I just say “The man interviewed was suspected of arsen.”
or in in this case I need to add “interviewed by…”?
Yankee
September 2, 2006, 6:43am
5
Good morning, Tamara
In your example, the interview would be finished. In Jupiter’s example, the interview is happening at the moment. (i.e., different meaning)
You don’t need the word by unless you want to say who conducted the interview.
By the way, Jupiter, the correct spelling is “arso n”.
Amy
Tamara
September 2, 2006, 7:00am
6
Good morning, Amy.
My dog is an early bird
Thank you for the answer.
Oh, yes. Quite usual for me – to have copied without thinking…
By the way, when I hear the pattern ’ is charged with (…murder, arson, whatever) – the preposition used seems to me rather strange and unnatural. Why with ?..
Alan
September 2, 2006, 7:18am
7
Hi Tamara,
Charged with suggests charged with the crime of. Consider also arrested for , accused of
Alan
Yankee
September 2, 2006, 7:18am
8
.
Good morning to your dog, too, then. Both of my cats are late risers. In fact, they hardly ever rise at all. :lol:
The word with is simply the preposition you need in combination with charge in order to state that someone is accused of having done a certain crime.
I don’t think there is a better explanation than that. Sorry.
Amy