Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel-Ielts task2

Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel to remote natural environments such as the South Pole. What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this development?

Travelling around the world specially untouched placed become a popular phenomena year on year. Although, the causes of this are varied, the overall trend of discovering new places is ballooning at a rapid rate. The advantages and disadvantages of this development will be analyzed in this essay.

On one hand, ability to go to unspoiled places poses benefits for both scientists and traveler. First one, it is believed that for finding proper answers that related to source of world, extinct and rare species choose destination like South Pole it would be wise decision. For example, recently a young scientist who travel to Amazon’ Jungle, find undiscovered butterfly that believed the oldest species of butterflies. As this shows, certain advantages can derive from science that boast travelling to natural environment.

On the other hand, unfortunately, this willing causes some issues like spoiled these places by visitors. People usually like to change environments by their taste and this lead to destroyed balance of habitation of animals that live there. For example, many shelters are built in dense jungle like Amazon not only wild animal ran away from these places but also majority of trees and plants are cut off. This phenomenon had negative ramification on nature. As this example shows, the ability to travel to distant locations can bring with disadvantages.

The advantages and disadvantages of this topic are numerous. However, after analyzing both side, it is felt travelling around the word particularly travel to nature environments presents more benefits than drawbacks.

TOEFL listening lectures: What is the main difference between a fad and a trend?

Hi Minooee, I thought you addressed the topic pretty well, though some of your arguments, especially in your second body paragraph could have been a bit more clear. You also had some errors in grammar and word choice. Overall, I would rate this a band 6.