(the) shifting sands (of something)
used to describe a situation that changes so often that it is difficult to understand or deal with “it”
In the above explanation, is “it” necessary?
(the) shifting sands (of something)
used to describe a situation that changes so often that it is difficult to understand or deal with “it”
In the above explanation, is “it” necessary?
You can leave the object pronoun ‘it’ since from the context it is clear that ‘to deal with’ refers to ‘situation’.
Torsten, when we construct the ‘so that’ clause, I think we need to use the object so as to make the meaning clear. It is not necessary in a ‘too … to’ construction.
Compare:
The situation changes so often that it is difficult to understand or deal with it. (the first it being a dummy subject)
The situation changes too often to be difficult to understand or deal with.
Your comments, please.
If you refer to the shifting sands of a situation, you mean that it changes so often that it is difficult to deal with.
I think Teo is right with quoting the example ‘If you refer to the shifting sands of a situation, you mean that it changes so often that it is difficult to deal with’.
Yes, if the ‘it’ in the example is to be treated as the pronoun for 'situation, I think I should agree.
Thanks, Torsten and Teo.