I disagree that face-to-face communication is better than other types communications, such as letters, e-mail, or telephone calls. I believe that each of the communication methods have advantage and disadvantage.
Face- to-face is the communication that they sit together and talk directly. This communication has benefit that both parties completely clear any topics or problems and come up with a solution to the problems together. However, the conclusion is only words and there are no any evidences to reference in the future. Other types of communications such as letters and e-mail are well equipped with evidences and supporting documents. Furthermore, the conclusion between both parties is official because there is e-mail or letters for reference. In addition, it has advantages in the future because letters and e-mail record all evidences. If we would like to lean about the previous case, we could find at e-mail or letters.
On the other hand, face–to-face communication, both parties have to control their emotion .It is easy to quarrel with each other if they don’t meet theirs satisfaction. Moreover, sometimes they don’t meet with a reasonable conclusion and miss a chance to find others solutions or sources because they have to make a decision immediately. Communications via letters, e-mail or telephone calls both parties avoid quarreling and they can hammer out a compromise.
All in all, face- to-face communication is useful for both parties discussing problems directly but other communications such as letters, e-mail and telephone calls are better in many ways.
I disagree that face-to-face communication is better than other types communications, such as letters, e-mail, or telephone calls. I believe that each of the communication methods have advantage and disadvantage.
Face- to-face is the communication WHERE they sit together and talk directly.
This communication has THE benefit that both parties completely clear any topics or problems and come up with a solution to the problems together.
However, the conclusion is only words and there IS no any evidence to refer TO in the future. Other types of communications such as letters and e-mail are well equipped with evidences and supporting documents.
Furthermore, the conclusion between both parties is official because there is AN e-mail or letters for reference.
In addition, it has advantages in the future because letters and e-mail record all evidence. If we would like to lean about the previous case, we could find THAT e-mail or THOSE letters.
On the other hand, IN face–to-face communication, both parties have to control their emotionS .It is easy to quarrel with each other if they don’t meet their INDIVIDUAL satisfaction. Moreover, sometimes they DO NOT COME TO AN AMICABLE conclusion and miss a chance to find other solutions or sources, because they have to make a decision immediately. Communications via letters, e-mail or telephone calls both parties avoid quarrelLing and they can hammer out a compromise.
All in all, face- to-face communication is useful for both parties discussing problems directly, but other communications such as letters, e-mail and telephone calls are better in many ways.
…
Good morning Groffy. Not bad.