Brawl vs Brawling.

  1. After the football match the brawl/brawling went on for several hours.

I know of brawl but not brawling is the latter also possible?
Besides, is brawling a noun?

Both are possible. Yes, “brawling” in that case is a noun. “brawling” seems better if there were a number of separate incidents of fighting.

Hi, Dozy.

It seems your comment of brawling being noun is ambiguious.
In fact, does it belong to other parts of speech apart from the noun?

It is just the same as any present participle. It can be an ordinary verbal past present participle, forming continuous tenses, as in “the fans were brawling”; it can behave like an adjective, as in “a mass of brawling fans”; it can behave like a noun, as in your sentence.

Hi, Dozy,

You have made mention of it being past participle and I know that the third form of a verb is its past participle, while some people call it the en form.

How come doesbawling be pp. It usage as pp here looks odd according to past perfect tenses:
-They had bawling for hours.
Save pp continuous:
-They had been brawling for hours.

…were brawling.
The usage here seem like present progressive preceding simple past, but not pp.
How do you consider my view?

If I may hasten to ask. Can one use brawl in its verbal sense?
By adding ed to it. Hence making brawled.

Thanks.:wink:

If I may hasten to ask. Can one use brawl in its verbal sense?
By adding ed to it. Hence making brawled.

Thanks.:wink:

Um, I’m afraid that was an unfortunate case of brain disengagement while typing. I did of course mean to say “present participle”.

Of course. “brawl” is an ordinary regular verb (it can also be a noun, as we have seen).